<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.vouchon.com/profile/cmayaud/">
		<title>cmayaud [i can vouchon]</title>
		<link>http://www.vouchon.com/profile/cmayaud/</link>
		<description />
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.vouchon.com/post/joomla-as-the-best-with-wordpress-2nd-best/" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.vouchon.com/post/joomla-as-the-best-with-wordpress-2nd-best/">
		<title>Joomla as the Best with Wordpress 2nd Best</title>
		<link>http://www.vouchon.com/post/joomla-as-the-best-with-wordpress-2nd-best/</link>
		<description>joomla is the best based on a large well organized active developer community with lots of mature add-onif your website touches many people in your organization and/or you need advanced publishing features and/or community building features and you need it to scale ... Joomla is the choice todayif you don't need the above, then often Wordpress is good enough ... WP also has active developer community and mature add-ons but it's strength is tied to it's blogging origins (Joomla can be used as a blog but it is an overkill)Most used both Wordpress and Joomla depending on the requirements</description>
		<dc:creator>cmayaud</dc:creator>
		<dc:date>2007-04-30T14:39:43Z</dc:date>
	</item>
</rdf:RDF>